题目内容双击单词支持查询和收藏哦～

题目材料：

In the 1920s, the Legal Realists, a group of constitutional scholars, challenged "formalism," the then-dominant style of legal reasoning in the United States. Proponents of formalism, believing that neither personal experiences nor a case's social implications should shape a judge's ruling, urged judges to decide difficult new cases by applying to such cases general principles deduced from the decisions of previous courts in similar instances. Legal Realists insisted that judges'decisions were influenced by the social implications of a decision and by life experiences the latter inevitably coloring judges' perceptions of a case's parties and witnesses and thus of its "facts, and that the legal principles derivable from previous decisions in similar instances were so inconsistent that such principles were likely to result in very different rulings. Thus, Legal Realists argued that legal principles, to be meaningful and useful, could not be general and abstract, but must instead refer to specific circumstances. Principles appropriate to deciding one case involving contracts might not be for another because contracts are entered into and enforced in widely different circumstances.

Which of the following best describes the relationship of the final sentence of the passage to the sentence that precedes it?

A.The final sentence illustrates a generalization made in the preceding sentence.
B.The final sentence offers an exception to the generalization made in the preceding sentence.
C.The final sentence evaluates a conclusion presented in the preceding sentence.
D.The final sentence corrects an assertion made in the preceding sentence.
E.The final sentence comments on an example presented in the preceding sentence.

A显示答案

登录后才可以添加做题笔记哦，还没有账号？马上注册

· 相关考点

句子功能作用题句子功能

句子功能

以上解析由考满分老师提供。

题目讨论

已经输入 0 个字标记为提问，会有更多小伙伴帮你解答提交

全部讨论

只看提问

按时间排序

按点赞数排序

拓展练习

练习记录

最新提问

题目内容双击单词支持查询和收藏哦～

题目讨论